<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Music Production Tips - The Stereo Bus Blog &#187; Sample Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestereobus.com/category/sample-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestereobus.com</link>
	<description>Music production, pro audio and engineering tips &#38; secrets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why 24/192 HD Audio Distribution Does More Harm Than Good</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2012/03/06/why-24192-hd-audio-distribution-does-more-harm-than-good/</link>
		<comments>http://thestereobus.com/2012/03/06/why-24192-hd-audio-distribution-does-more-harm-than-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sample Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[192]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher monty montgomery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sampling rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xiph.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I read an excellent writeup on the tribulations of distributing music at &#8220;HD&#8221; quality like 192khz/24bit. In his writeup he goes over some of the very things I&#8217;ve brought up in the past: harmonic distortion introduced by ultrasonic frequencies, storage considerations, and the extremely well-documented limits to human hearing. Christopher “Monty” Montgomery, an expert [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestereobus.com/2012/03/06/why-24192-hd-audio-distribution-does-more-harm-than-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Analogy to High Definition Sample Rate Conversion</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sample Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[88.2khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[96khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dithering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been working pretty much exclusively at 24-bit/44.1khz but now DAWs are fast enough and hard drives are cheap enough that there's no good reason not to step it up.  192khz is simply overkill.  Most DACs simply upsample to achieve that rate and response can actually be poorer as a result.  This leaves the choice between 96khz and 88.2khz.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  thestereobus.com/category/sample-rates/feed/ ) in 0.37333 seconds, on May 21st, 2012 at 7:36 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2012 at 8:36 pm UTC -->
