<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Music Production Tips - The Stereo Bus Blog &#187; sample rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestereobus.com/category/sample-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestereobus.com</link>
	<description>Music production, pro audio and engineering tips &#38; secrets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Analogy to High Definition Sample Rate Conversion</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[88.2khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[96khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dithering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been working pretty much exclusively at 24-bit/44.1khz but now DAWs are fast enough and hard drives are cheap enough that there's no good reason not to step it up.  192khz is simply overkill.  Most DACs simply upsample to achieve that rate and response can actually be poorer as a result.  This leaves the choice between 96khz and 88.2khz.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
