Comments on: Visual Analogy to High Definition Sample Rate Conversion http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/ Music production, pro audio and engineering tips & secrets. Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:08:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Dan Connor http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-7173 Dan Connor Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:17:41 +0000 http://thestereobus.com/?p=208#comment-7173 Absolutely right. So unless you have super high-end filters, stick with even sample rate conversions! Absolutely right. So unless you have super high-end filters, stick with even sample rate conversions!

]]> By: Rosmunda http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-7147 Rosmunda Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:54:59 +0000 http://thestereobus.com/?p=208#comment-7147 <i>Very nice. The math nerd in me wants to point out that the 88.2 -> 44.1 conversion comes out cleaner because of the direct halving. 96 -> 44.1 is a 2:1 ratio whereas the 96 -> 44.1 is approximately 2.177 to 1 ratio. It makes sense you’d lose clarity in an uneven division like that. Even the cheapest of components should be able to accurately divide by 2. </i> +1 Very nice. The math nerd in me wants to point out that the 88.2 -> 44.1 conversion comes out cleaner because of the direct halving. 96 -> 44.1 is a 2:1 ratio whereas the 96 -> 44.1 is approximately 2.177 to 1 ratio. It makes sense you’d lose clarity in an uneven division like that. Even the cheapest of components should be able to accurately divide by 2.
+1

]]> By: Dan Connor http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-5417 Dan Connor Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:40:17 +0000 http://thestereobus.com/?p=208#comment-5417 That's actually exactly my point! Even 1/2 ratio comes out cleanest :) That’s actually exactly my point! Even 1/2 ratio comes out cleanest :)

]]> By: Joga Luce http://thestereobus.com/2010/01/02/visual-analogy-to-high-definition-sample-rate-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-5416 Joga Luce Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:55:00 +0000 http://thestereobus.com/?p=208#comment-5416 Very nice. The math nerd in me wants to point out that the 88.2 -> 44.1 conversion comes out cleaner because of the direct halving. 96 -> 44.1 is a 2:1 ratio whereas the 96 -> 44.1 is approximately 2.177 to 1 ratio. It makes sense you'd lose clarity in an uneven division like that. Even the cheapest of components should be able to accurately divide by 2. Digitally dividing by a decimal extending out to 30 places probably isn't as easy to engineer as it sounds. No pun intended. Very nice. The math nerd in me wants to point out that the 88.2 -> 44.1 conversion comes out cleaner because of the direct halving. 96 -> 44.1 is a 2:1 ratio whereas the 96 -> 44.1 is approximately 2.177 to 1 ratio. It makes sense you’d lose clarity in an uneven division like that. Even the cheapest of components should be able to accurately divide by 2.

Digitally dividing by a decimal extending out to 30 places probably isn’t as easy to engineer as it sounds. No pun intended.

]]>