<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balanced vs. Unbalanced: Prepared for Rejection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/</link>
	<description>Music production, pro audio and engineering tips &#38; secrets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connor</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-7174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-7174</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends on the quality and type of the USB device.  USB isn&#039;t an analog connection - it&#039;s not even a digital audio connection, strictly speaking.  It also has bus powered voltage running through it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends on the quality and type of the USB device.  USB isn&#8217;t an analog connection &#8211; it&#8217;s not even a digital audio connection, strictly speaking.  It also has bus powered voltage running through it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andritch A.</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-6762</link>
		<dc:creator>Andritch A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-6762</guid>
		<description>Cool...now what about usb connections? balanced? unbalanced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8230;now what about usb connections? balanced? unbalanced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connor</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>That makes some sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes some sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeamScottSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>TeamScottSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Rode&#039;s intent is to eliminate ground loops.  Having a cable run from one bit of equipment with it&#039;s power source, across a distance to another bit of equipment using a different power source,can create hum in the line.  There can be a difference in potential between the two equipment grounds, that is equalizing itself through your cable&#039;s ground wire.  

I wouldn&#039;t build all my cables that way, I would deal with ground loops on a case by case basis.  In a studio&#039;s permanent wiring, I probably would drop the ground at the source end and tie it at the destination end, to avoid ground loops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Rode&#8217;s intent is to eliminate ground loops.  Having a cable run from one bit of equipment with it&#8217;s power source, across a distance to another bit of equipment using a different power source,can create hum in the line.  There can be a difference in potential between the two equipment grounds, that is equalizing itself through your cable&#8217;s ground wire.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t build all my cables that way, I would deal with ground loops on a case by case basis.  In a studio&#8217;s permanent wiring, I probably would drop the ground at the source end and tie it at the destination end, to avoid ground loops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connor</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>@ CHiTT Productions

Thanks for the kind words!  Funny you should mention that - one of my topics to write about in the future is &#039;Making Your Own Cables&#039;.  For XLR cables, I&#039;ve always done a &#039;signal ground&#039; such as you describe, grounding to pin 1.  While I worked at as an intercom technician at Telex Communications this is how we did it there, too.  Rode&#039;s assertion makes no sense to me, either.  I can&#039;t think of how that would be useful... unless maybe it was &#039;signal gounded&#039; on one end and &#039;chassis grounded&#039; on the other.

Hope this helps. Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ CHiTT Productions</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words!  Funny you should mention that &#8211; one of my topics to write about in the future is &#8216;Making Your Own Cables&#8217;.  For XLR cables, I&#8217;ve always done a &#8216;signal ground&#8217; such as you describe, grounding to pin 1.  While I worked at as an intercom technician at Telex Communications this is how we did it there, too.  Rode&#8217;s assertion makes no sense to me, either.  I can&#8217;t think of how that would be useful&#8230; unless maybe it was &#8216;signal gounded&#8217; on one end and &#8216;chassis grounded&#8217; on the other.</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHiTT Productions</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/23/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>CHiTT Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/24/balanced-vs-unbalanced-what-does-it-mean/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve returned to this site several times because it&#039;s given me a few tricks I would have never thought of myself.  Thanks.

I have a burning question that I&#039;ve never been able to find a definitive answer for in all my years of audio engineering, and maybe you can shed some light, or at least wonder out loud with me-- perhaps an &quot;intermediate balanced&quot; post in the future?

I make my own audio cables because it&#039;s cheaper and I&#039;m not independently wealthy.  My question is what to do with the ground on an 3 pin XLR cable?  When dissecting factory manufactured XLR cables there doesn&#039;t seem to be a standard method for terminating the ground wire: on some cables the ground is a &quot;signal ground&quot; and only connects to pin 1, and on other cables,the ground wire is jumped to the chassis (creating a &quot;chassis ground&quot;).  Right now I&#039;m just making cables with a signal ground running all the way through from pin 1 to pin 1 with no jump to the chassis.  

Reading the literature from Rode doesn&#039;t help because they suggest everyone is doing it wrong and the only way to properly balance a 3 pin XLR cable is to completely disconnect the signal ground on one end of the cable (can&#039;t remember which gender is unterminated off the top of my head).  This practice doesn&#039;t make the least bit of sense to me.  AES literature is unforthcoming too and there seems to be a lot of infighting in the industry and no true standard yet.  What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve returned to this site several times because it&#8217;s given me a few tricks I would have never thought of myself.  Thanks.</p>
<p>I have a burning question that I&#8217;ve never been able to find a definitive answer for in all my years of audio engineering, and maybe you can shed some light, or at least wonder out loud with me&#8211; perhaps an &#8220;intermediate balanced&#8221; post in the future?</p>
<p>I make my own audio cables because it&#8217;s cheaper and I&#8217;m not independently wealthy.  My question is what to do with the ground on an 3 pin XLR cable?  When dissecting factory manufactured XLR cables there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a standard method for terminating the ground wire: on some cables the ground is a &#8220;signal ground&#8221; and only connects to pin 1, and on other cables,the ground wire is jumped to the chassis (creating a &#8220;chassis ground&#8221;).  Right now I&#8217;m just making cables with a signal ground running all the way through from pin 1 to pin 1 with no jump to the chassis.  </p>
<p>Reading the literature from Rode doesn&#8217;t help because they suggest everyone is doing it wrong and the only way to properly balance a 3 pin XLR cable is to completely disconnect the signal ground on one end of the cable (can&#8217;t remember which gender is unterminated off the top of my head).  This practice doesn&#8217;t make the least bit of sense to me.  AES literature is unforthcoming too and there seems to be a lot of infighting in the industry and no true standard yet.  What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
