<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stereo Microphone Techniques &amp; Placement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/</link>
	<description>Music production, pro audio and engineering tips &#38; secrets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connor</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Phatband - 

Try condensing it down to mono.  If you still hear a full frequency range, consider yourself lucky.  As they say - if it sounds right it is right!  People stumble across things that should be &#039;wrong&#039; but sound great all the time.  That&#039;s a very common placement for a nice thumpy low-cymbal stereo pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phatband &#8211; </p>
<p>Try condensing it down to mono.  If you still hear a full frequency range, consider yourself lucky.  As they say &#8211; if it sounds right it is right!  People stumble across things that should be &#8216;wrong&#8217; but sound great all the time.  That&#8217;s a very common placement for a nice thumpy low-cymbal stereo pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phatband</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>phatband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2008/01/18/stereo-microphone-techniques-placement/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insightful and straightforward appraisal of the options for a good stereo image.

At work I&#039;ve got two audio technica 330a&#039;s which are cheap for large diaphram cardiod mics but like a lot of people say- it&#039;s where you put them!

Anyway today I tried laying them out in an X/Y shape but because it seemed to suit my stereo bar, I laid them out &#039;horizontally&#039; ( laid down flat, but faces to the kit) with the grills almost touching. It seemed to me that I got a great stereo image of a drum kit,  with them placed at between the height of bass drum and snare and about two feet from the kit. I kept the gain medium on the pre-amp because this rig was intended for a contemporary &#039;jazz&#039; improv. session. I&#039;m writing because I was really pleased with myself, but can&#039;t help wondering whether I&#039;m fooling myself about the result. Can I really have got a 180% image with horizontal mics? surely they should be upright to pan correctly, or am I just lucky and stupid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insightful and straightforward appraisal of the options for a good stereo image.</p>
<p>At work I&#8217;ve got two audio technica 330a&#8217;s which are cheap for large diaphram cardiod mics but like a lot of people say- it&#8217;s where you put them!</p>
<p>Anyway today I tried laying them out in an X/Y shape but because it seemed to suit my stereo bar, I laid them out &#8216;horizontally&#8217; ( laid down flat, but faces to the kit) with the grills almost touching. It seemed to me that I got a great stereo image of a drum kit,  with them placed at between the height of bass drum and snare and about two feet from the kit. I kept the gain medium on the pre-amp because this rig was intended for a contemporary &#8216;jazz&#8217; improv. session. I&#8217;m writing because I was really pleased with myself, but can&#8217;t help wondering whether I&#8217;m fooling myself about the result. Can I really have got a 180% image with horizontal mics? surely they should be upright to pan correctly, or am I just lucky and stupid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.169 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-19 10:46:44 -->

