<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compression Sends vs. Compression Inserts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/</link>
	<description>Music production, pro audio and engineering tips &#38; secrets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vtlabs</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>vtlabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thx Dan :-)

I was just anyways trying to rule out the &quot;best possible&quot; way ... rather the best practice.

One more thing ... Well a reverb effect being directly proportional to the real room acoustics hence it seems better to share a single 100% reverb accross all channels thru the send bus ... but now I feel that as Compression needs to be different per voice / instrument its better to put it oer track as an insert OR atleast can rarely be shared by multiple tracks if used thru send buses 

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Dan :-)</p>
<p>I was just anyways trying to rule out the &#8220;best possible&#8221; way &#8230; rather the best practice.</p>
<p>One more thing &#8230; Well a reverb effect being directly proportional to the real room acoustics hence it seems better to share a single 100% reverb accross all channels thru the send bus &#8230; but now I feel that as Compression needs to be different per voice / instrument its better to put it oer track as an insert OR atleast can rarely be shared by multiple tracks if used thru send buses </p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Connor</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey vtlabs...

Seems to me that they leave the option to insert things on individual tracks simply to increase the flexibility.  Sometimes you DO want to compress just a single track, or maybe you want to have a reverb on a single track element and then compress it, or have a send have an effect before it&#039;s sent.  Basically - why not?  It&#039;s better than having two dozen effects sends...

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey vtlabs&#8230;</p>
<p>Seems to me that they leave the option to insert things on individual tracks simply to increase the flexibility.  Sometimes you DO want to compress just a single track, or maybe you want to have a reverb on a single track element and then compress it, or have a send have an effect before it&#8217;s sent.  Basically &#8211; why not?  It&#8217;s better than having two dozen effects sends&#8230;</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vtlabs</title>
		<link>http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>vtlabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestereobus.com/2007/12/22/compression-sends-vs-compression-inserts/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi .. a good topic.

Can you please comment on a thing that why really these s/w like Nuendo/Sonar etc allow us to put the FX inserts per track especially reverb &amp; compressors.

 Does that have a special reason ?

Thanks &amp; regards 
Happy New Year !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi .. a good topic.</p>
<p>Can you please comment on a thing that why really these s/w like Nuendo/Sonar etc allow us to put the FX inserts per track especially reverb &amp; compressors.</p>
<p> Does that have a special reason ?</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; regards<br />
Happy New Year !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
